Journal Paper Format Explained: Avoid These Common Formatting Mistakes

Being published in a prestigious journal is perhaps the most gratifying landmark in the career of a researcher. Yet powerful, insightful research is rejected not on its merits, but for faulty formatting. In scholarly publishing, journal paper format is not simply a cosmetic issue. It reflects directly upon the writer's professionalism, care, and knowledge of scholarly standards.

In this blog, we will walk you through the standard journal paper structure, cover why you should do it, and highlight some of the common faults with formatting that will ruin your chances of publication. If you are about to submit your manuscript, use this guide to avoid pitfalls and organize your work with confidence.

 

Why Journal Formatting Is Important

Editors deal with hundreds of manuscripts every year. Some are rejected before peer review merely because they don't follow the journal's submission guidelines. Formatting errors send a message: the author hasn't taken time to make journal policy yield, which can lower credibility prior to even considering the content.

Proper formatting:

• Improves readability by readers and reviewers

• Creates a professional, polished appearance

• Accelerates the editorial and review process

Whether you’re submitting a case study, research article, or systematic review, following the correct journal paper format gives your work a solid first impression.

 

Standard Journal Paper Format: Key Sections

While formatting templates may vary between journals, most follow a consistent structure. Let’s break down the typical components of a scholarly paper:

1. Title and Author Information

Your title should be clear, specific, and concise, highlighting the focus of your research. Include:

• Full names of all authors

• Institutional affiliations

• Email of the corresponding author

• Check the order and styling instructions given in the journal instructions.

2. Crafting a Concise and Effective Abstract

Your paper's first (and often only) chance to engage an editor or reviewer.

• Stick to the word limit (usually 150–250 words)

• Declare the research aim, methodology, results, and conclusion

• Eschew references, abbreviations, or excessive jargon

• Place 4–6 keywords following the abstract

3. Precise Introduction

The introduction should:

• Define the research problem

• Explain why it's important

• Provide a brief literature review

• State research objective or hypotheses

4. Valuable Methodology

Explain the necessity of methodology, 

• Study design and methodology

• Materials and equipment used

• Data collection and analysis methods

Clarity is paramount, any other researcher should be able to repeat your study from this section alone.

5. Effective Results

Report data objectively using:

• Tables

• Graphs

• Figures

Do not report results, but save that for the discussion section. Caption figures clearly and cite them appropriately in the text.

6. Detailed Discussion

Explain how your results contribute 

• What the results mean

• How they compare with prior research

• Study limitations

• Future research suggestions

• Be analytical, not promotional in tone.

7. Clear Conclusion

Synthesise briefly your findings and their contribution to the area of study. Do not repeat the abstract.

8. Proper References

Use the citation format required by the journal (e.g., APA, MLA, Vancouver). Check twice:

In-text citations correspond to the reference list

Punctuation, italics, and formatting are consistent

Having trouble? This Journal Publication service can provide expert help with formatting your references and citations to meet the needs of a specific journal.

 

The Most Common Formatting Mistakes to Avoid

Now you are familiar with the format, let's talk about the most common formatting mistakes that can ruin your submission.

1. Incorrect Referencing Style

Different journals accommodate different citation formats. Submitting an APA-formatted paper to a Vancouver-needs journal is a deal-killer.

Avoid this by:

• Using software like Zotero or EndNote

• Looking at recent articles for examples of format

2. Vague or Incomplete Abstract

A poorly written abstract can result in outright rejection. Editors often read the abstract first before deciding whether the manuscript should be fully reviewed.

Common mistakes:

• Omission of primary results

• Insertion of background instead of the research purpose

• Wordiness outside limits

• Well-written abstract will increase chances to pass peer review.

3. Low-Quality Figures and Tables

Your results will be difficult to interpret for the reviewers if your images are poorly defined or poorly formatted.

Avoid:

• Using low-resolution photos

• Not mentioning images in the body text

• Missing captions or legends

• Use formats like TIFF or EPS, and follow the journal file requirements for images.

4. Too Much Passive Voice

Too much passive voice can weaken clarity and slow down readability.

Example:

•  Passive: "The data were collected through interviews."

•  Active: "We collected the data through interviews."

5. Inconsistent Headings and Structure

Journals insist on a logical hierarchy in headings. So avoid using

• Blending heading styles (e.g., bold vs. italics) 

• Omitting required sections dictated by the journal

• Using non-standard labels such as "Background" instead of "Introduction"

• Always follow the journal's specific naming and formatting conventions for section headers.

6. Word or Page Excess

Word limits are most often specified by most journals for the whole manuscript, abstract, and even titles.

Check the following: 

• Total words with references

• Supplementary file limits

• Journal-specific page limits

Looking for help to shorten your manuscript effectively? Our PhD Assistance editors can restructure and shorten your paper without losing impact.

7. Missing Ethical Declarations

In case your research work involves human or animal subjects, you must include:

• Ethics Committee or IRB approval

• Participant consent statements

• Conflict of interest declarations

Leaving these out will lead to delay in review or even outright rejection.

8. Sending Generic Templates

Using old templates without updating for the intended journal typically leads to:

• Misaligned margins

• Archaic citation styles

• Lacking essential sections

Always download the latest author template from the journal website.

9. Forgetting Supplementary Files

Most journals require supplementary files like:

• Datasets

• Author contribution statements

• Data availability statements

Not uploading them can be detrimental to your paper even if the core material is fine.

 

Formatting Checklist Prior to Submission

Prior to submission, utilize this quick checklist:

•  All parts exist and correctly labelled

•  Abstract is in journal style and word count

•  Tables/figures are high-quality and correctly labelled

•  References are correct and in the right style

•  Ethics and conflict of interest declared

•  Supplementary files uploaded, if applicable

•  Font style, line spacing, and margins adhere to journal guidelines

 

Format Carefully. Submit Confidently.

Formatting is not an afterthought is a necessary part of the publishing process. A professionally formatted manuscript demonstrates that you are invested in your research and its delivery. Honoring the proper journal paper format contributes to your acceptability and demonstrates respect for the editorial process.

 

Stuck struggling to finalize your manuscript?

We've guided hundreds of researchers step by step through the process of journal publication, be it editing and formatting or getting published successfully. Let our Journal Publication team assist you in preparing your paper to international standards. 

Start your project now and give your manuscript the professional edge it deserves.